Last update: 2 September 2010
© John Benjamins
|
Blurb
Table of contents
Quotes
Subjects
Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness
Edited by Robin T. Lakoff and Sachiko IdeUniversity of California, Berkeley / Japan Women’s University
2005. xii, 342 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Hardbound
– In stock
978 90 272 5382 8 / EUR 120.00 / USD 180.00
e-Book
– Available from e-book platforms
978 90 272 9411 1 / EUR 120.00 / USD 180.00
Ordering information
This collection of 19 papers celebrates the coming of age of the field of politeness studies, now in its 30th year. It begins with an investigation of the meaning of politeness, especially linguistic politeness, and presents a short history of the field of linguistic politeness studies, showing how such studies go beyond the boundaries of conventional linguistic work, incorporating, as they do, non-language insights. The emphasis of the volume is on non-Western languages and the ways linguistic politeness is achieved with them. Many, if not most, studies have focused on Western languages, but the languages highlighted here show new and different aspects of the phenomena. The purpose of linguistic politeness is to aid in successful communication throughout the world, and this volume offers a balance of geographical distribution not found elsewhere, including Japanese, Thai, and Chinese, as well as Greek, Swedish and Spanish. It covers such theoretical topics as face, wakimae, social levels, gender-related differences in language usage, directness and indirectness, and intercultural perspectives.
Table of contents
Acknowledgments
|
ix
|
Foreword
|
xi–xii
|
Introduction: Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness
Robin T. Lakoff and Sachiko Ide
|
1–20
|
|
|
|
Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your face
Robin T. Lakoff
|
23–43
|
How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals
Sachiko Ide
|
45–64
|
Whither politeness
Bruce Fraser
|
65–83
|
|
|
|
Yoroshiku onegaishimasu: Routine practice of the routine formula in Japanese
Makiko Takekuro
|
87–97
|
An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness: Evidence from the use of the imperative in Cypriot Greek
Marina Terkourafi
|
99–116
|
The significance of ‘face’ and politeness in social interaction as revealed through Thai ‘face’ idioms
Margaret Ukosakul
|
117–125
|
|
|
|
Face threatening acts, primary face threatening acts, and the management of discourse: Australian English and speakers of Asian Englishes
Christopher J. Conlan
|
129–144
|
Politeness in Thai computer-mediated communication
Krisadawan Hongladarom and Soraj Hongladarom
|
145–162
|
Polite diminutives in Spanish: A matter of size?
Martha Mendoza
|
163–173
|
Indirectness as a politeness strategy of Thai speakers
Deeyu Srinarawat
|
175–193
|
|
|
|
Japanese honorifics as a marker of sociocultural identity: A view from non-western perspectives
Megumi Yoshida and Chikako Sakurai
|
197–215
|
Directness as a source of misunderstanding: The case of requests and suggestions
Alexandra Kallia
|
217–234
|
Forms of address in Irish and Swedish
Anders Ahlqvist
|
235–244
|
Women, men and polite requests: English and Greek
Ekaterini Kouletaki
|
245–274
|
Privacy: An intercultural perspective
Mark Lê
|
275–282
|
Selection of linguistic forms for requests and offers: Comparison between English and Chinese
Masako Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Cynthia Patschke and Qin Zhang
|
283–298
|
|
|
|
Japanese pronouns of address: Their behavior and maintenance over time
Andrew Barke and Satoshi Uehara
|
301–313
|
An aspect of the origins and development of linguistic politeness in Thai
Wilaiwan Khanittanan
|
315–335
|
Index
|
337–342
|
“The papers are a welcome addition to the literature on politeness and will have broadened the base from which scholarship that attempts to develop an etic model of politeness can draw its evidence. [...] To the extent that the volume offers perspectives on politeness behaviour from a range of cultural insiders, it is a useful contribution to the body of evidence against which claims about universality can be tested. ”
Chris Christie, Loughborough University
|